There will be more iterations of this Fiji GPU based product though.
Amd radeon r9 fury x series#
Over at E3 2015 AMD announced the new Fury series of products, an enthusiast class graphics cards series with the flagship product being called the Radeon R9 Fury X, and it is quite the beast based on what you guys know as the Fiji XT GPU. Most of the rumors in terms of specifications were right, the performance benchmarks you have seen leaked, all fake. So yes, it has been a wild ride over the past few weeks alright. This initial Fury X model is already liquid cooled for you. A product that is big in performance, it is fitted with that all new HBM memory and is based on a small form factor.
ganeshts: The NAND part of the quoted tweet is factually wrong.We review the Radeon R9 Fury X, one of the most discussed and anticipated products of the year. gavbon86: NVIDIA RTX 4090 pricing might look good in dollars, but in the UK, the pound is incredibly weak and those prices us…. gavbon86: I say that, but it's still incredibly expensive. gavbon86: That confirmed? Even better then. gavbon86: Thank you for that, so not nearly as bad as I thought! What about AIB partner cards?. gavbon86: Further to my previous tweet, here's the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40 series UK pricing:. RyanSmithAT: I don't know why the difference is quite so significant, but I'm sure we'll find out. I'm short-staffed right now and the CPU world is very busy Samsung 8nm to TSMC 4N is a massive shift. The problem is that GPU reviews are incredibly time intensive. Though since GPUs aren't made on FD-SOI, it's a bit academic in this case RyanSmithAT: More so the latter than the former. We’d need to be able to overclock to better than 1100MHz to see any major overclocking gains on the R9 Fury cards. This is actually a bit better than the R9 Fury X and its 5% performance gains, however it’s still not going to provide a huge difference in performance. Using our highest clocking card as a reference point, the Sapphire card, the actual performance gains are in the 7-10% range, with an average right up the middle at 8% over a reference clocked R9 Fury. There’s not a ton of headroom here before artifacting sets in, but we were able to get another 10% (50MHz) out of both R9 Fury cards. Meanwhile with unofficial memory overclocking support now attainable via MSI Afterburner, we’ve also tried our hand at memory overclocking. Ultimately we’re able to get another 75MHz out of the ASUS, for 1075MHz, and another 60MHz out of the Sapphire, for 1100MHz. Neither R9 Fury card is able to overclock as well as our R9 Fury X, indicating that these are likely lower quality (or lower headroom) chips. 
As a result the card has relatively little overclocking potential without voltage adjustments.
There is no voltage control at this time (even unofficial) and the card’s voltage profile has been finely tuned to avoid needing to supply the card with more voltage than is necessary. While cooling and power delivery are overbuilt on both the Asus and Sapphire cards, the R9 Fury is still very restricted when it comes to overclocking.
Finally, no review of a high-end video card would be complete without a look at overclocking performance.Īs was the case with the R9 Fury X two weeks ago, overclockers looking at out of the box overclocking performance are going to come away disappointed with the R9 Fury cards.
0 kommentar(er)
